Pick of the Week - Nov 10 [Show all picks]
Path Finder 5 - A feature-laden Finder replacement
Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsFAQHeadlinesRSS
12,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the '10.5: List 64-bit enabled GUI applications in 10.5' hint
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
10.5: List 64-bit enabled GUI applications in 10.5
Authored by: Michelasso on Tue, Mar 11 2008 at 4:59AM PDT
Is at least the kernel coded at 64 bits? Not that it matters too much to most users. The only app I have that makes an heavy use of the CPU is VisualHub.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: List 64-bit enabled GUI applications in 10.5
Authored by: abyone on Tue, Mar 11 2008 at 10:34AM PDT
No, the kernel is 32bit

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: List 64-bit enabled GUI applications in 10.5
Authored by: mzs on Tue, Mar 11 2008 at 12:55PM PDT
Yes 32-bit kernel:

$ file /mach_kernel*
/mach_kernel:        Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/mach_kernel (for architecture i386):	Mach-O executable i386
/mach_kernel (for architecture ppc):	Mach-O executable ppc
/mach_kernel.ctfsys: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/mach_kernel.ctfsys (for architecture i386):	Mach-O executable i386
/mach_kernel.ctfsys (for architecture ppc):	Mach-O executable ppc
Anyone know what the difference between /mach_kernel.ctfsys and /mach_kernel is?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: List 64-bit enabled GUI applications in 10.5
Authored by: ajmas on Wed, Mar 12 2008 at 2:16PM PDT
No, the kernel is 32bit

What computer did you do this check with?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Kernel in Leopard is 32 bit only
Authored by: hamarkus on Wed, Mar 12 2008 at 2:36PM PDT
At the last Chaos Computer Club conference in Hamburg, Germany, probably the biggest indie programmers conference in Germany, a talk about the structure of Leopard discussed this issue. It was made clear that the kernel is still 32 bit, but it was concluded that as long the kernel does not need more than 4 GB (2 GB?) of memory itself this does not really matter, and the kernel itself is certainly for from needing this much of memory (except that caching might make use of more memory).
http://chaosradio.ccc.de/24c3_m4v_2303.html

[ Reply to This | # ]