Pick of the Week - Nov 10 [Show all picks]
Path Finder 5 - A feature-laden Finder replacement
Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsFAQHeadlinesRSS
12,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the '10.5: Add a 'recent things' stack to the Dock' hint
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
10.5: Add a 'recent things' stack to the Dock
Authored by: blukens on Wed, Nov 14 2007 at 7:59AM PST
Okay, I'm going to be totally vain here and take credit for that "defaults" command. It's definitely my Ars post that mithras is referring to. So, uh, go me?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Add a 'recent things' stack to the Dock
Authored by: mantrid on Wed, Nov 14 2007 at 8:12AM PST
Oh come on! If a feature exists. it's just a matter of discovering it, and there are only so many ways to execute a given command.

Your comment was posted Nov 4 (which "mithras" credited you with when posting Nov 5).

Considering this hint was submitted on Nov 1, I would say "manum" is ahead of you.

You know that Conan bit where the guy gets the stamp on his face?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Add a 'recent things' stack to the Dock
Authored by: blukens on Wed, Nov 14 2007 at 8:40AM PST
Hey, I'm just kidding around here. Clearly the real credit goes to manum, or whoever discovered the hack originally.

I just thought it was cool that my own slight contribution was kinda sorta used on the site. That's all. Sure, anyone who's familiar with "defaults" could have done the same thing, but I did spend a little time figuring it out. And if mithras can get credit for passing it along, I should get a little something, right? ;)

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Add a 'recent things' stack to the Dock
Authored by: robg on Wed, Nov 14 2007 at 8:53AM PST
Credit granted :), and if this hint ends up winning the contest, well, I'm technically not sure what would happen ... we'd have to go to the judges on that one (saw an iMac in thirds?). I'm sure we'd figure something out!

regards,
-rob.

[ Reply to This | # ]