Pick of the Week - Nov 10 [Show all picks]
Path Finder 5 - A feature-laden Finder replacement
Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsFAQHeadlinesRSS
12,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it' hint
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it
Authored by: joab on Wed, Jul 9 2008 at 7:59AM PDT
If the program is delivered in a .pkg you can also press cmd+i to show all files that will be installed.

[ Reply to This | # ]
Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it
Authored by: corienti on Wed, Jul 9 2008 at 8:29AM PDT
But that won't let you know about files the app creates when it first runs...

This is a good tip; I've used this precise technique myself in the past on sneaky apps.

[ Reply to This | # ]
Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it
Authored by: Black on Wed, Jul 9 2008 at 8:43AM PDT
Really? I've never seen any evidence that Cmd+i lists the files that are going to be installed, and it certainly doesn't for any of the .pkg files that I have lying around. What packages have you seen this work for and where in the info panel does it appear?

[ Reply to This | # ]
Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it
Authored by: fracai on Wed, Jul 9 2008 at 8:47AM PDT
I assume this is another way to bring up the "File Install" list available from within the Package Installer.

---
i am jack's amusing sig file

[ Reply to This | # ]
Remove every trace of a program by reinstalling it
Authored by: corienti on Wed, Jul 9 2008 at 9:21AM PDT
In Installer.app, command-I (or File -> Show Files) brings up a tree-style of files that will be installed. It only works for .pkg or .mpkg installations.

However, that naturally can't show you files that the app creates the first time you start it.

Incidentally, my comment about this being a good hint was referring to the original hint, using fseventer - not the Cmd-I way.




[ Reply to This | # ]