Pick of the Week - Nov 10 [Show all picks]
Path Finder 5 - A feature-laden Finder replacement
Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsFAQHeadlinesRSS
12,000 hints and counting!

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac System 10.5
10.5: For a long time now, I've wished that there was a way in OS X to create a shared folder which disregarded file permissions. In particular, I want all the users to be able to read and write to all the files in the shared folder. This is very useful to me, because I want to have only library for each of iTunes, iPhoto and Aperture, and share those libraries between all the users on my Mac.

I've tried many different things, but they were either too hacky or they just didn't work as advertised. I've come up with the following method which works, is safe, is not a hack, and is easy to implement. The secret to this technique is to use Access Control Lists (ACLs). The procedure is as follows:
  1. Create a new group. The easiest way to do this is through the Accounts pane in System Preferences. Just click on the Plus sign to add a new account and then select Group from the New Account drop-down menu. Call this group anything you want; I called mine friday. Add all the users who you want to participate in the file sharing to your newly-created group.
  2. Do the following steps in Terminal, in Applications -> Utilities:
    1. cd into the /Users/Shared directory: cd /Users/Shared.
    2. Create a new folder where the users will be able to share their files. I created a folder named Friday by typing mkdir Friday.
    3. Change the group of the new folder to your newly-created group: sudo chown admin:friday Friday.
    4. Change the default permissions, if you wish: sudo chmod 770 Friday (this is optional if you're happy with the default permissions).
    5. Create the ACL entry for the new folder:
      sudo chmod +a "group:friday allow delete,readattr,writeattr,readextattr,writeextattr,list,search,add_file,add_subdirectory,delete_child,file_inherit,directory_inherit" Friday
You now have a folder where all members of the group friday can read, write and delete files, as well as read, write to and create new sub folders. The ACL rule takes precedence over standard UNIX file permissions and is automatically inherited. It's this automatic inheritance that is really important.

Now you are ready to copy your iTunes, Aperture, iPhoto libraries, plus anything else you want to share, into the shared folder. IMPORTANT: You must copy (hold down Option in Finder prior to dragging), and not merely move, items. This is particularly important with bundles, such as the Aperture library bundle for example. Moving items doesn't seem to always inherit the correct ACL rules. Copying ensures that the files are actually created in the shared folder, thereby forcing the ACL rules to be inherited.

[robg adds: This hint has been in the queue for a while -- I had tagged it as something I wanted to try with our shared iMac, then basically forgot about it. My apologies for not publishing it sooner. We've run similar hints for related subjects in the past, but this method seems reasonably simple and easy to understand. I still, of course, haven't tested it yet.]
    •    
  • Currently 0.00 / 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  (0 votes cast)
 
[12,776 views]  

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac | 41 comments | Create New Account
Click here to return to the '10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac' hint
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tempel on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:03AM PDT
I wonder: Is there still no easy-to-use tool with a graphic user interface for checking and modifying ACLs on OS X?

If so, maybe it's time for someone to write one...



[ Reply to This | # ]
Sandbox
Authored by: hayne on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:22AM PDT
Sandbox ( http://mikey-san.net/sandbox/documentation/about.html ) provides a GUI for manipulating ACLs.

[ Reply to This | # ]
possible contention issue?
Authored by: SOX on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:08AM PDT
Finally! man I've been waiting for this hint for a long time. The inability to share iphoto and itunes is maddening.

However, I assume locking is there for a reason. That is it's quite easy to accidentally get two copies of iphoto running when you have two user accounts. It happens when you have a camera plugged in and then fast user switch. iphoto can autostart in both user accounts. You could imagine that if both are writing to the same database it could get ugly.

what I've noticed is that if I have itunes pointed to the same directory from both users that right now that when the second itunes app launches it refuses to run because it detects the other itunes app has locked something. so that's a safety I guess.

But I don't know how it does this. if it uses permissions to regulate access then maybe that will screw up the handshake?

what's your experience on that? Can two copies of itunes or iphoto run after you do this?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: sbnelson on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:41AM PDT

Couldn't this have been done easier by creating the group and then giving the group read/write permissions to the directory?

sudo chmod g+rwx Friday



[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: sbnelson on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:43AM PDT
oops:

chgrp friday Friday
chmod g+rwxs Friday

The "s" means that files created in/copied to that directory will inherit the group of the directory.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Solarusdude on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 11:34AM PDT
This would work for the existing files in the directory, but probably wouldn't work for any new files. In my experience with POSIX permissions, when you copy a file into a directory, it will generally inherit the directory's owner, but it will not inherit the permission bits assigned to the directory.

For created files, the directory's set-UID and set-GID permission bits must be set in order for the file to be assigned the directory's user and group (or else it will be assigned to whatever user created the file). The permissions for the file will most likely be 755 (but that may be different if you altered the umask).

The tip listed above attempts to overcome these issues by using an ACL on the shared directory which is generally better at getting new files within that directory to conform to the directory's permissions.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 1:26PM PDT
Also, using the setuid/setgid bits can create security holes if any executable code is put into one of these folders. Whereas the ACL method would simply allow anyone to execute the code as themselves, using the setuid or setgid bits could allow privilege escalation by allowing anyone to run the code as someone else (e.g. as an admin, or even as root), making it possible for them to mess around with things they ought not to be able to mess around with.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 1:27PM PDT
Also, using the setuid/setgid bits can create security holes if any executable code is put into one of these folders. Whereas the ACL method would simply allow anyone to execute the code as themselves, using the setuid or setgid bits could allow privilege escalation by allowing anyone to run the code as someone else (e.g. as an admin, or even as root), making it possible for them to mess around with things they ought not to be able to mess around with.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 9:23AM PDT
I haven't tested this, but I think you can just:
  1. open the Sharing Preferences
  2. enable File Sharing
  3. add the folder you want to share, and
  4. choose what users get to share it.
you probably have more fine-grained control using ACLs, of course, but this seems a lot simpler.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: SOX on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 10:22AM PDT
sharing is different that write prefs

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 10:51AM PDT
That won't accomplish what this hint does. With this hint, any files created in the Friday folder can be read, written, and executed by everyone. So if your user adds a photo to iPhoto, your wife's user can edit it.

With just sharing, you are getting nothing more than the permissions on the Shared folder already allow: anyone can read, write, and browse the folder itself, but the files and subfolders in the folder remain subject to the usual permissions restrictions. So if your user added a photo to iPhoto, your wife's user could not edit it.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 4:57PM PDT
err... I'm trying to imagine a case where you'd want to give other users permission to execute arbitrary code in your user space. at best, it adds no value that can't be accomplished by putting scripts in /Library for general access; at worst it's a huge security hole.

execution aside, file sharing can set read and write privileges - so yes, in fact, your wife could open, edit, and save your iPhoto entires from her account (assuming you're married; if you're not, and she does, that would be confusing). you may need to move your iPhoto folders into the shared folder, or easier, you could use the sharing panel to make your iPhoto folder shared in and of itself (which I think automatically propagates to its subfolders). what advantage does the command-line approach offer over the file sharing panel, aside from that highly questionable execution issue?

[ Reply to This | # ]

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 11:21AM PDT
Execution matters because opening a folder is in fact "executing" it. Intuitively one might think that opening a folder involved "reading" it, but in this case intuition in incorrect.

Have you ever tried to look inside another user's home folder and found folders with little "no access" icons on them that you couldn't open? This is because your user does not have execute permissions for that folder. This is the mechanism used to create the drop box folder inside your user's public folder: everyone has write permissions for the drop box (i.e. they can add files to it), but only you have execute permissions (i.e. only you can see what is inside it).

This matters a lot for things like iPhoto and iTunes libraries, because if a newly created folder inside one of those libraries is not executable by everyone, then the most recently added photos (to return to my previous example), which are stored in their own subfolder, will not be available to any user other than the one who first added them.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 12:48PM PDT
in fact, no.

I just tested this on my system: I enabled file sharing, added the pictures folder from a different account to the shared folders column, gave everyone read and write permission, enabled my main account and the other account in the 'options' section, and then voila! I went and opened a picture from the pictures folder on the other account, and saved it back to the other account under a different file name. the little 'no access' badge that's normally on the another user account's pictures folder disappears as soon as I enable sharing for that folder (though it still appears in the system preferences panel until you quit and restart that app).

have you tried it? in this case my 'intuition' seems to be backed up by practical evidence. I understand what you're saying, and it makes a certain degree of sense within the twisted universe of pure unix, but don't underestimate Apple's ability to make functional GUI methods.

[ Reply to This | # ]

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 2:11PM PDT
I did try it, apparently more thoroughly than you did.

Sharing a folder with read and write permissions will allow another user or group to open the folder and to put files into the folder (yes, Apple's GUI is simplifying read, write & execute into simply "read & write"). But sharing the folder doesn't allow another user to edit a file inside the folder unless and until the permissions on the individual file in question are manually modified (via Finder's Info window or the command line or some other method).

So if my wife's user adds some documents to a shared folder, I can see the document files in the folder and even open them up to read them, but I can't save any changes to them. If I try, I get an error about not having the proper access privileges.

Having to manually modify the permissions on a file isn't too bad to work with for an occasional individual file, but when dealing with the innards of an iPhoto or iTunes library, where many files all over the place are being added and edited all the time, one needs a system in place that will take care of all the permissions issues on all the files and subfolders automatically. That's what this hint about ACLs provides.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 2:17PM PDT
Addendum:

The key point here is that in your test you "saved it back to the other account under a different file name." You had to save it into the shared folder with a new name because you were only allowed to create new files, not to edit ones you didn't already own. That won't work when dealing with iTunes and iPhoto. They need to be able to edit files, or the library breaks.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 11:49AM PDT
Also, this hint doesn't give other users "permission to execute arbitrary code in your user space." Any code they might execute is run as themselves, not as you.

Perhaps you have this confused with the setuid and setgid bits, which do allow a user to run code as if they were someone else.

[ Reply to This | # ]

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 12:56PM PDT
what I meant was they can place any script they like in your user directory and execute it. what happens if someone wrote a script like
#! /bin/bash rm -fr ..
from a script located in your pictures folder. it probably wouldn't work, but if it did it would delete your home directory. again, what advantage do you get out of granting execute privileges that makes opening the door to this kind of thing acceptable?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 1:41PM PDT
This hint describes using the ACLs to set permissions on a folder inside /Users/Shared, not a user's home folder (/Users/username). A bash script such as the one you mention would only affect the Shared folder, not anyone's home folder.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Dr. T on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 11:54AM PDT
"err... I'm trying to imagine a case where you'd want to give other users permission to execute arbitrary code in your user space."

How about your spouse who also uses your home Mac? My wife wouldn't want to and wouldn't know how to "execute arbitrary code" (which I assume is a bizarre phrase meaning "run malware").

I gave up on separate "his" and "her" accounts years ago, because the benefits were too small to justify the hassles. Our main account is a regular user account. I maintain the admin account. iTunes and some iPhoto files are shared across accounts.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 1:01PM PDT
I can see you've never been through a nasty break-up. :) and (knock wood) you never will. my philosophy is 'don't fix what aint broke' but also 'don't make something that breaks just cuz you can't imagine having to fix it'.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 1:45PM PDT
Now you are just being silly. If you had a nasty breakup, why are you giving this girl access to your machine? Delete her account, and then she won't be able to log in at all.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tedw on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 2:31PM PDT
dude, you rarely know in advance that you're going to have a nasty breakup.

I don't actually know whether you're right or wrong about the other stuff, but you're way too involved in the issue for me to bother discussing it further. do it the way you want to do it; not a big issue either way.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: ragmaxone on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 10:04AM PDT
I did the trick using PrefPane and it works...
I compared the result for the 'ls -le' and it's exactly the same. (oops sorry for the mistake: the group's name and the folder's name are not the same)

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 2:20PM PDT
I also posted this in reply to tedw, but its buried in there and I thought you might not see it, ragmaxone. I'd hate for you to accidentally mess up your iPhoto or iTunes library, so I'm reposting it here too. :)

Sharing a folder with read and write permissions will allow another user or group to open the folder and to put files into the folder (yes, Apple's GUI is simplifying read, write & execute into simply "read & write"). But sharing the folder doesn't allow another user to edit a file inside the folder unless and until the permissions on the individual file in question are manually modified (via Finder's Info window or the command line or some other method).

So if my wife's user adds some documents to a shared folder, I can see the document files in the folder and even open them up to read them, but I can't save any changes to them. If I try, I get an error about not having the proper access privileges.

Having to manually modify the permissions on a file isn't too bad to work with for an occasional individual file, but when dealing with the innards of an iPhoto or iTunes library, where many files all over the place are being added and edited all the time, one needs a system in place that will take care of all the permissions issues on all the files and subfolders automatically. That's what this hint about ACLs provides.

[ Reply to This | # ]
More Tips For: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: gerritdewitt on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 12:20PM PDT
Very good post and well-written for those new to assigning permissions with chmod.

Here are a few more tips and suggestions related to your post:

Copying and Moving
Now you are ready to copy .... anything .... into the shared folder. IMPORTANT: You must copy .... and not merely move...

See my answer to an Apple Discussions posting for more detail about how permissions are set on copied items and why they don't change for moved ones: here. Moving an item won't change its permissions at all. Everything – POSIX owner, POSIX group, POSIX permission bits, explicit ACL entries, and inherited ACL entries – is preserved. This is because the item you're moving isn't really changing; it's not a copy.

Step 5 - Adding the ACL Entry

Again, this is a very good example, but the command you've provided is best executed on an empty folder, because it will only set the ACL for that folder. The syntax chmod +a PATH only applies the new entry to the folder or file in question. Since the applied entry also contains the file_inherit and directory_inherit controls, it will be copied onto new items that arrive within the parent. New items includes newly-created files and folders or items that you copy there. Hence, the ACL entry set on the parent (Shared) will be inherited to new or copied items only.

But what if your parent folder (Shared) already has items in it that you want to make available to others? Or, what if you just want to move your iTunes Library there without actually having to duplicate it? You can do this, but you have to move it there then apply chmod with an extra option: -R. The -R flag means "recursive," and it tells chmod to apply the same ACL to the parent and any existing (e.g. already-moved) items. Pretty neat. Here's the syntax for reference:

chmod -R +a "group:friday allow file_inherit,directory_inherit,readattr,readextattr,readsecurity,
read,execute,list,search,writeattr,writeextattr,delete,append,write,delete_child,add_file,
add_subdirectory" /Users/Shared
--Gerrit

[ Reply to This | # ]
More Tips For: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: bcometa on Mon, Jun 8 2009 at 11:11AM PDT
thanks for the explanation!

[ Reply to This | # ]
Not working for AD groups with spaces - chomod: unable to translate to a UID/GID
Authored by: mdwoernhard on Tue, Jun 16 2009 at 2:34AM PDT
I tried this on Leopard 10.5.7 bound to AD (but not OD, no magic triangle) for the AD-group "Domain Users", but both command line and Sandbox application fail with error message:

chmod: Unable to translate 'INTRANET\domain' to a UID/GID

Looks like the space is the problem, and neither quoting or escaping did help (group:'INTRANET\domain users' ... "group:INTRANET\\domain\ users"). Since Sandbox neither handles this correctly, I am wondering if this is a parsing bug in chmod?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: tsanga on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 12:27PM PDT
Good hint - I've been using this for a while. I adopted a similar method that was working for Tiger described here:
http://www.macworld.com/article/50643/2006/05/junedigitalphoto.html
and here:
http://ad.hominem.org/log/2005/07/acl.php

And Sandbox is an excellent tool for overcoming Leopard's obvious shortcomings in managing ACLs.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Dr. T on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 2:57PM PDT
I am not getting it. There already is a Shared folder in the Users folder. This folder is read/write for all users. If you keep your iTunes music and your iPhoto files there, they can be accessed by all users. Any other documents in the Shared folder are accessible to all users.

If you need to share almost everything, then why have separate user files at all?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: JimMueller on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 6:09PM PDT
The files in our Shared folders all are editable by the original owner but the group [wheel] and others have read only.
Periodically we push the Shared folder's permissions (group and others have read-write) down to all documents in the Shared folder, but this ACL thing would make our lives somewhat easier.


[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Sesquipedalian on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 11:39AM PDT
As I mentioned in reply to another comment above, everyone has full permissions for the Shared folder itself, but any files inside the Shared folder are another matter.

Under normal conditions, both User1 and User2 can add files to the Shared folder, and typically User2 can read User1's files that are stored there, but normally User2 cannot edit User1's files. Even though the folder is freely open to everyone, the file remains under the usual restrictions.

What this hint does is set things up so that files added to the Shared folder (or rather, if you follow the hint's directions precisely, a folder within the Shared folder) automatically have their permissions modified so that anyone can do anything with the files themselves.

[ Reply to This | # ]

10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Dr. T on Fri, Jun 5 2009 at 12:04PM PDT
"Under normal conditions, both User1 and User2 can add files to the Shared folder, and typically User2 can read User1's files that are stored there, but normally User2 cannot edit User1's files."

I haven't seen this unless a user deliberately protects a file. I've been able to edit from the User2 account iTunes, iPhoto, Excel, Word, AppleScript, Canvas, GraphicConverter, Preview and other files created in the User1 account and placed in the Shared users folder. My Shared folder has permissions set at read & write for me, system, wheel, and everyone.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: scottbayes on Thu, Jun 4 2009 at 8:32PM PDT
Since at step 2 you become the owner of the newly created Friday directory, I think (without having verified all the combos) that steps 3, 4, and 5 can be executed without the sudo.

Also, I was able to execute step 3 with a simple
chgrp friday Friday
and custom access seemed to be properly granted thereafter.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: redarm69 on Mon, Jun 8 2009 at 2:09PM PDT
Step 3 in Terminal doesn't work (on my Mac anyway), as you change the owner to admin, which is actually a group and my Mac doesn't allow two groups as owner and group.

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Frederico on Mon, Jun 15 2009 at 12:07AM PDT
This is probably a cool and useful hint for a single-drive, single-volume Mac, but I've rarely owned one of those where EVERYONE had to use the same files, the exception being the iTunes Library, and even then I *always* use partitioning to create at least a Users volume, and usually a Media volume, as well.

On any tower I always have a Users drive and a Media (or simply 'Shared Files') drive, too; both of these strategies have saved my butt dozens of times when the System volume becomes un-bootable *and* unmountable for various reasons. It's also super-helpful for backup strategies of data that doesn't change often enough to warrant daily/weekly or even monthly backups.

The point of this is that the Media/Shared Files drive/volume is simply set to 'Ignore Ownership on This Volume', and the /Users/Shared/ folder's various Music/Movies/Icons/Pictures/Wallpapers/Installers/etc. is/are Symlinked to live on the Media volume, thus having zero permissions issues.

Accomplishes everything in your hint, with little fuss, and, unlike the other commenters suggesting Shared folders as alternative, your local all-access volumes can be hidden from network sharing altogether, should security of the shared folder be desired to be restricted to local access only.

Still, ACLs are totally cool, and I appreciate this hint for it's potential other uses.

Cheers

Rico

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: paulw on Tue, Jun 16 2009 at 7:58AM PDT
For those who don't have an already partitioned drive, could a similar thing be accomplished by keeping the iTunes library on a sparse disk image, again with "ignore ownership on this volume" checked?

[ Reply to This | # ]
10.5: Share any files between users on the same Mac
Authored by: Frederico on Fri, Jun 19 2009 at 3:12AM PDT
A quick test with a handful of songs says yes. Very cool idea, BTW. Could be very, very useful; e.g., to share adult content (explicit songs, NC-17 movies, etc.) from the same computer by simply password-protecting the disk image.

Possible drawbacks would include slower access time and possible frame-rate drops for HD content unless the DMG is located on a very fast drive or a raid.

This might qualify as a hint unto itself, don't you think, Rob G.?

[ Reply to This | # ]
Is this a consequence?
Authored by: Coomba on Fri, Jun 26 2009 at 7:02AM PDT
Brand spanking new Mac User here. I followed your directions, but on Step 3 my new MacBook Pro (as in maybe a week old) returned "invalid argument". I searched the comments, tried again, then settled on trying a posters suggestion:

chgrp friday Friday

Seems to have worked. But now, my iPod Touch won't sync.

I tried just about everything short of restarting the iPod (holding down the Home and Lock buttons). My iPod's there, with the battery level and eject button. No sync option anywhere (unless there is a hidden one).

I can only think it's a consequence of something I did. Could be unrelated I suppose, but I didn't mess with it beforehand. At this point, I am willing to to try it all, even if you think I skipped a step, pipe up. If I delete the group and folder I created, can I start from the top?

[ Reply to This | # ]
Share users entire home directories on Mac 10.4+
Authored by: candis987 on Tue, Jul 7 2009 at 12:21AM PDT
I wanted to share mine and my wife's entire home directories. It uses the same technique mentioned in this article, modified slightly. I've been doing this several months on my Mac at home, and me and my wife have had no problems in sharing our files. We even share our iPhoto Library, which was my main goal. I've blogged about it here: Sharing Files With Other Mac Users

[ Reply to This | # ]
no-entry icon
Authored by: xerox on Sat, Nov 21 2009 at 7:15AM PST

Finder was displaying a no-entry traffic sign icon on the shared folder ("/Users/Shared/Friday" in the article), and I could not double-click it to open it.

The solution is to add execute to the ACL, like this:

sudo chmod +a "group:friday allow delete,readattr,writeattr,readextattr,writeextattr,list,search,add_file,add_subdirectory,delete_child,execute,file_inherit,directory_inherit" Friday

Edited on Sat, Nov 21 2009 at 7:17AM PST by xerox


[ Reply to This | # ]